An Exploratory Study on Buyers' Participation in Reputation Systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
Online reputation systems have been found to be an effective way to ensure honest behavior from the seller in consumer to consumer (C2C) e-commerce. At the same time, reputation systems have also been regarded as an important platform where large-scale of word-of mouth behavior and evaluations of the purchase experience could be communicated. There are altogether two components in online reputation systems: ratings and textual feedback. Thus, reputation systems are often considered to be constituted of buyers’ quantitative scoring and qualitative feedback which offers an important reference to other buyers when deciding whether or not to buy from a seller. The aim of this study is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the antecedents and motivation of buyers’ participation in the C2C reputation system after each transaction. Due to a lack of related research, interviews with online buyers have been first conducted to help to decide the research scope and identify the main antecedents. Satisfaction and conflict handling styles have a significant impact on willingness to submit a positive rating. The study also confirms that willingness to submit textual feedback could be investigated through WOM behaviour and online contribution.
منابع مشابه
Self-Interest, Reciprocity, and Participation in Online Reputation Systems
Abstract Reputation systems are emerging as an increasingly important component of online communities, helping elicit good behavior and cooperation among loosely connected and geographically dispersed economic agents. A deeper understanding of the factors that drive voluntary online feedback contribution is crucial to the long-term viability of such systems and of the online communities that re...
متن کاملStrategic Behavior in Online Reputation Systems: Evidence from Revoking on eBay
This study examines how sellers respond to changes in the design of reputation systems on eBay. Specifically, we focus on one particular strategic behavior on eBay’s reputation system, the sellers’ explicit retaliation against negative feedback provided by buyers to coerce buyers into revoking their negative feedback. We examine how these strategic sellers respond to the removal of their abilit...
متن کاملExtensive Experimental Validation of a Personalized Approach for Coping with Unfair Ratings in Reputation Systems
The unfair rating problem exists when a buying agent models the trustworthiness of selling agents by also relying on ratings of the sellers from other buyers in electronic marketplaces, that is in a reputation system. In this article, we first analyze the capabilities of existing approaches for coping with unfair ratings in different challenging scenarios, including ones where the majority of b...
متن کاملOnline Reputation and Litigation as Mechanisms for Quality Assurance: Strategic Implications for Profits and Efficiency
Recent advances in information technology have dramatically reduced the cost of collecting, processing and disseminating consumer feedback, thus enabling low-cost online reputation mechanisms with global reach. This paper identifies certain settings in which the ability of such mechanisms to economically aggregate feedback across a large number of different buyers and disjoint transactions can ...
متن کاملMechanisms for coping with unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior in online reputation reporting systems
Reputation reporting systems have emerged as an important risk management mechanism in online trading communities. However, the predictive value of these systems can be compromised in situations where conspiring buyers intentionally give unfair ratings to sellers or where sellers discriminate on the quality of service they provide to different buyers. This paper proposes a set of mechanisms tha...
متن کامل